• Print this page

The Politics of Preference

Democratic Institutions and Affirmative Action in the United States and India
Sunita Parikh
Examines the history of affirmative action programs in two ethnically heterogeneous democracies, India and the United States

Description

Sunita Parikh examines the history and fate of affirmative action programs in two ethnically heterogeneous democracies, the United States and India. Affirmative action programs in the United States represent a controversial policy about which the American public feel at best ambivalence and at worst hostility, while in India the expansion of reservation policies in recent years has led to riots and contributed to the fall of governments. And yet these policies were not particularly controversial when they were introduced. How the policy traveled from these auspicious beginnings to its current predicament can best be understood, according to Parikh, by exploring the changing political conditions under which it was introduced, expanded, and then challenged.

Although they are in many respects very different countries, India and the United States are important countries in which to study the implementation of ascriptive policies like affirmative action, according to Parikh. They are both large, heterogeneous societies with democratic political systems in which previously excluded groups were granted benefits by the majorities that had historically oppressed them. Parikh argues that these policies were the product of democratic politics—which required political parties to mobilize existing groups as voters—and the ethnically heterogeneous nature of Indian and U.S. society—where ethnic markers are particularly salient sources of identification as groups. Affirmative action in both countries was introduced because it could be used to solidify and expand electoral coalitions by giving benefits to defined minority groups, according to Parikh. As the policy became better known, it became more disliked by non-targeted groups, and it was no longer an appeal which was cost free for politicians.

This book will be of interest to social scientists concerned with race and ethnic relations and with the comparative study of political and social systems.

Sunita Parikh is Assistant Professor of Political Science, Columbia University.

Praise / Awards

  • ". . . a first serious attempt at a comparative analysis of the development of affirmative action in the United States and another country, in this case India. . . . Should be of interest to historical institutionalists and scholars of policymaking, and it might fit nicely into a race politics course."
    Contemporary Sociology
  • ". . . provides a concise and fluent account of the political circumstances in which the policies have been debated. . . . The author has achieved her stated purpose very successfully."
    Commonwealth & Comparative Politics
  • "Sunita Parikh's excellent and important book traces the origin and course of two affirmative action policies over several decades and shifting political regimes in the world's two largest democracies. . . . The Politics of Preference combines the best attributes of two very different approaches in the political science tradition—rational choice analysis and 'comparative historical analysis," and does so quite fruitfully. As Parikh discusses, policy decisions are made by politicians with strategic motivations that derive from the context in which they operate and hope to prosper. Thus, the dual focus on strategic calculations on the one hand, and on social, cultural, and historical context on the other, is not only intriguing--it is vital."
    Political Science Quarterly

Product Details

  • 6 x 9.
  • 248pp.
Available for sale worldwide

  • Hardcover
  • 1997
  • Available
  • 978-0-472-10745-2

Add Hardcover of 'The Politics of Preference' to Cart
  • $80.00 U.S.
  • $80.00 CAN

Related Products


nothing
nothing
nothing

Stay connected

  • Visit UM Press on Facebook
  • Visit UM Press on Twitter
  • Visit UM Press on YouTube