Page 79, Clip 1: Mr. Alan Jenkins, assistant to the Solicitor General, sets out his defense of the fruit-marketing program.
[Download]
Page 80, Clip 1: Justice O'Connor asks Mr. Jenkins why the government did not press the bar and union analogy in the lower courts.
[Download]
Page 82, Clip 1: Justices Ginsburg and Souter press Jenkins on the mandatory-fee line of cases under which the fee program must serve and important interest.
[Download]
Page 83, Clip 1: Colloquy between Justice Scalia and Jenkins regarding similar programs launched for the same reason.
[Download]
Page 84, Clip 1: Chief Justice Rehnquist expresses skepticism, suggesting that it would be possible to "organize the market without government advertising.".
[Download]
Page 85, Clip 1: Mr. Campagne, representing the growers, dwells on the flaws and disparate treatment of different fruits, irritating Chief Justice Rehnquist.
[Download]
Page 85, Clip 2: The problems cascade for Campagne who confronts hard questioning from Justice Stevens.
[Download]
Page 88, Clip 1: Several justices pounce on Camgagne's critical concession to Stevens.
[Download]
Page 89, Clip 1: Kennedy is unimpressed with Campagne's First Amendment position.
[Download]
Page 90, Clip 1: Rather than purpose his First Amendment argument, Campagne criticizes the rule-making procedures and incurs Justice O'Connor's impatience.
[Download]
Page 91, Clip 1: Campagne tries one more time but O'Connor shreds his argument.
[Download]
Page 91, Clip 2: Campagne reverts to his forced advertising argument, ignoring the First Amendment claims.
[Download]
Page 91, Clip 3: Justice Stevens identifies the flaw in Campagne's argument. Campagne persists unwilling to change tack.
[Download]
Page 91, Clip 4: Campagne makes his point about red plums versus green plums with an uncomfortable exchange with Justice Scalia.
[Download]
