How Pindar and Aeschylus—in distinct but complementary ways—treat the concepts of reciprocity, truth, and gender as interlocked and intertwined

Table of contents

Contents

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
PROLOGUE: CONTEXTS FOR COMPLEMENTARITY 
   The Structure of the Book
CHAPTER ONE: RECIPROCITY AND TRUTH IN PINDAR AND AESCHYLUS
   Reciprocity          
   Reciprocity and Truth in Pindaric Epinician       
      Poetry and Reciprocity in Pindar       
      Alētheia and Poetic Reciprocity        
      Truth Personified: Fragment 205 and Olympian 10  
   Reciprocity, Revenge, and Truth in Aeschylus   
      The Language of Reciprocity in Aeschylus  
      Reciprocity and Truth? The Danaids’ Ode to Zeus   
      Truth as “What Happens”      
      Truth in Untruth: Clytemnestra         
      The Truth of Reciprocity       
   Conclusion           
CHAPTER TWO: THE TRUTH OF RECIPROCITY IN PINDAR’S MYTHS         
   Olympian 10: Truth, Obligation, and Reciprocity          
   Truth, Praise, and Poetic Obligation in Olympian 1       
   Parity, Reality, and Poetry: Nemean 7    
   Conclusion           
CHAPTER THREE: GENDER, RECIPROCITY, AND TRUTH IN PINDAR        
   The Significance of Gender         
   The Hera-Cloud of Pythian 2      
      The Active-Passive Paradox: Feminizing Male Deception  
      The Hera-Cloud’s Ancestors and Epinician Poetry  
   Coronis in Pythian 3: Alētheia, Myth, And Poetry         
      Coronis and Poetry    
   Hippolyta in Nemean 5: Seduction, Deception, Poetry  
   Male Seduction    
      Aegisthus and Clytemnestra in Pythian 11    
      Jason and Medea in Pythian 4
   Conclusion           
CHAPTER FOUR: WOMEN KNOW BEST: AESCHYLUS’ SEVEN AGAINST THEBES 
   Eteocles’ Attempt at Narrative Control   
   The Chorus’ Messengers 
      Etumos and Alēthēs   
      Sight, Sound, and Interpretation       
      Danaus as Comparison          
   The Shields: Partial Visions And Truths 
      Tydeus
      Capaneus and Eteoclus          
      Hippomedon and Parthenopaeus       
      Amphiaraus   
      Polyneices: Symmetry and Repetition          
   The Chorus and the Continuity of Reciprocity   
      Alēthēs           
   Conclusion           
CHAPTER FIVE: FEMALE AUTHORSHIP: FORGING TRUTH IN AESCHYLUS’ SUPPLIANTS          
   Truth and Time    
   Truth and Dikē     
   The Danaids as Autobiographers
   The Danaids and Pelasgus: Forging Collaboration         
   The Limits of Female Narrative Control 
   Conclusion           
CHAPTER SIX: TRUTH, GENDER, AND REVENGE IN AESCHYLUS’ ORESTEIA  
   Clytemnestra and the Herald: Different Sources of Truth          
      Gendered Truths: Etumos and Alēthēs          
   Cassandra: Truth in Prophecy     
      Cassandra as Mirror: Time, Truth, Reciprocity        
   Female Truth and Tragedy          
   Aegisthus: Revenge without Truth          
   The Evolution of Reciprocity and Truth in Choephori and Eumenides     
   Conclusion           
EPILOGUE    
BIBLIOGRAPHY

Description

In Reciprocity, Truth, and Gender in Pindar and Aeschylus, author Arum Park explores two notoriously difficult ancient Greek poets and seeks to articulate the complex relationship between them. Although Pindar and Aeschylus were contemporaries, previous scholarship has often treated them as representatives of contrasting worldviews. Park’s comparative study offers the alternative perspective of understanding them as complements instead. By examining these poets together through the concepts of reciprocity, truth, and gender, this book establishes a relationship between Pindar and Aeschylus that challenges previous conceptions of their dissimilarity. The book accomplishes three aims: first, it shows that Pindar and Aeschylus frame their poetry using similar principles of reciprocity; second, it demonstrates that each poet depicts truth in a way that is specific to those reciprocity principles; and finally, it illustrates how their depictions of gender are shaped by this intertwining of truth and reciprocity. By demonstrating their complementarity, the book situates Pindar and Aeschylus in the same poetic ecosystem, which has implications for how we understand ancient Greek poetry more broadly: using Pindar and Aeschylus as case studies, the book provides a window into their dynamic and interactive poetic world, a world in which ostensibly dissimilar poets and genres actually have much more in common than we might think.

Arum Park is Assistant Professor of Classics at the University of Arizona.

“This book is persuasive, engaging, and thought-provoking. Park’s arguments and interpretations are compelling . . . I very much hope the book will generate conversation and further engagement with the issues it raises and will lead to more classicists looking at Pindar and Aeschylus side by side.”
—Louise Pratt, Emory University

- Louise Pratt

“This study is unique both in its thematic breadth and in its generic scope. It offers new insights into the construction of gender in Greek literature by exploring in detail how gender informs the performance and the perception of truth and lies in epinician and tragedy. It also advances our epinician poetics by examining the intersection of truth and reciprocity between poet and patron, but also by exposing Pindar’s treatment of female desire and seduction as inherently threatening to male-dominated reciprocal relationships.” 
—Zoe Stamatopoulou, Washington University in St. Louis

- Zoe Stamatopoulou

Read: Blog post by the author | May 18, 2023 | Link