How a free press can unite America

Table of contents

Acknowledgments
INTRODUCTION
CHAPTER 1—A DESCENDING DARKNESS
CHAPTER 2—A BUDDING NATION FINDS ITS VOICE
CHAPTER 3—THE YARD SIGN THAT SAID ‘NO’ TO CENSORSHIP
CHAPTER 4—AN EPIC BATTLE, A VICTORY FOR PRESS FREEDOM
CHAPTER 5—INSIDE THE NEWSROOM, BEHIND THE STORY
CHAPTER 6—UNTANGLING ACCUSATIONS OF JOURNALISM BIAS
CHAPTER 7—JOURNALISM, EVERYDAY TALK, AND THE FUTURE FOR PUBLIC LIFE
CHAPTER 8—A CITIZENSHIP ETHIC FOR A TIME OF DIMINISHED JOURNALISM
CHAPTER 9—ASSUMING RESPONSIBILITIES FOR THE REPUBLIC
 

Description

Since the Founding, America’s faith in a democratic republic has depended on citizens who could be trusted to be communicators. Vigorous talk about equality, rights, and collaboration fueled the Revolution, the Declaration of Independence, and the Constitution with its amendments. In a republic, the people set the terms for their lives not individually, but in community. The genius of keeping it alive exists in how everyday citizens talk and listen, write and read, for a common good. Dialogue and deliberation—rather than an accumulation of individual preferences—sustains a republic, yet a diminished and scarred institution of journalism jeopardizes citizens’ access to shared and truthful information. A disturbing “what’s in it for me?” attitude has taken over many citizens, and a creeping, autocratic sense of dismissive accusation too often characterizes the political style of elected officials.

The basic fuel for democracy is the willingness of informed citizens to take each other seriously as they talk about political choices. Once we begin to clam up, build walls, and dismiss each other, we unravel the threads tying us to the Founders’ vision of a republic. A free press and free speech become meaningless if not supported by sustained listening to multiple positions. There are those who profit by dividing citizens into two camps: a comfortable “us” versus a scary “them.” They make their case with accusations and often with lies. They warp the very meaning of communication, hoping citizens never truly discover each other’s humanity. Democracy’s News discusses today’s problems of public communication in the context of history, law, and interpersonal life. News should not be something to dread, mistrust, or shun. Aided by reliable, factual journalism, citizens can develop a community-based knowledge to cope with social issues great and small. They come to treat neighbors and strangers as more than stereotypes or opponents. They become collaborators with whom to identify and sustain a working republic where news, citizenship, and public discourse merge.

G. Michael Killenberg is Professor Emeritus and Founding Director of the Department of Journalism and Digital Communication at the University of South Florida.

Rob Anderson is Professor Emeritus in the Department of Communication at Saint Louis University.

“There are not many books that place journalism within a framework of empowering democracy. Democracy’s News does that squarely and well.”

—Angie Drobnic Holan, Editor-in-Chief, PolitiFact

- Angie Drobnic Holan

“Few understand the centrality of public discourse to the health of democracy better than G. Michael Killenberg and Rob Anderson. Here is their ultimately optimistic plan for journalism to take on its proper role and responsibility in informing—no, improving—conversation and citizenship in an age of truly social media.”
—Jeff Jarvis, Craig Newmark Graduate School of Journalism, City University of New York

- Jeff Jarvis

"Geared toward citizens who care about democracy, Democracy’s News is engaging, well written, and would be a fine addition to journalism, media studies, and political science collections. . . Highly recommended."
Choice

- C. McCutcheon