Putting Inequality in Context
Class, Public Opinion, and Representation in the United States
Highlights the role of contextual factors, including class, in U.S. political inequality
Rising income inequality is highlighted as one of the largest challenges facing the United States, affecting civic participation and political representation. Although the wealthy often can and do exert more political influence, this is not always the case. To fix political inequality, it is important to understand exactly how class divisions manifest themselves in political outcomes, and what factors serve to enhance, or depress, inequalities in political voice.
Christopher Ellis argues citizens’—and legislators’—views of class politics are driven by lived experience in particular communities. While some experience is formally political, on an informal basis citizens learn a great deal about their position in the broader socioeconomic spectrum and the social norms governing how class intersects with day-to-day life. These factors are important for policymakers, since most legislators do not represent “the public” at large, but specific constituencies.
Focusing on U.S. congressional districts as the contextual unit of interest, Ellis argues individuals’ political behavior cannot be separated from their environment, and shows how income’s role in political processes is affected by the contexts in which citizens and legislators interact. Political inequality exists in the aggregate, but it does not exist everywhere. It is, rather, a function of specific arrangements that depress the political influence of the poor. Identifying and understanding these factors is a crucial step in thinking about what reforms might be especially helpful in enhancing equality of political voice.
“An important topic by a rising scholarly star . . . this is a strong book that will have a big impact on the study of political inequality in the U.S. and beyond.”
—Christopher Wlezien, University of Texas at Austin
“This book has the potential to shift the scholarly debate on inequality and representation by showing that we must consider the local context to understand these processes and outcomes.”
—Peter K. Enns, Cornell University
You May Also Be Interested In
Available for sale worldwide
Add to Cart
- Open Access